Planning and Implementing Salt Iodization at the Operational level
Overview
"We need to work with large, medium, and small producers across the
region to ensure that all salt for human and animal consumption is effectively
iodised. Salt exporters and importers should accept iodised salt as the only
norm. Leakages of non iodised salt across markets and borders need to be
plugged"
Venkatesh Mannar, President, Micronutrient Initiative
Like other fortification initiatives, salt iodization requires an
effective and ongoing partnership between the public sector, the private sector
and civil society. Government, the salt industry, and civil society
organizations all have key roles to play to ensure an effective and sustainable
program.
The Role of Governments
Governments play a key role in creating an enabling environment for salt
producers to ensure the long- term sustainability of the salt industry and
fortification in salt-producing countries. Government also needs to ensure that
trade-related policies supports rather than undermines the consumption of
iodized salt. Government roles thus include setting and enforcing regulations
and standards, improving infrastructure (roads, transport), and ensuring that
taxes and duties affecting the salt industry do not have a negative effect on
the consumption of iodized salt.
Regulations and Standards:
34 countries in Africa have adopted legislation to regulate the
production and distribution of iodized salt (Allen, et al, 2006. p 120)
WHO
Food fortification Guidelines
There is a need to for standard iodine levels across countries in
Africa. This will promote salt trade between countries and simplify the
monitoring of salt iodization.
Trade, taxes and duties
High taxes and duties on the salt industry are lucrative for governments
in the short term, but their long term social and economic impacts are
negative. It contributes to poor sales of salt, since prices are not
competitive in the international market. This prevents growth and expansion
within the industry, and inhibits job creation. This in turn reduces tax
revenues for governments. Furthermore, from a development standpoint, poor
performance with the prevention of IDD contributes to reduced GDP, increases
the burden on the health care system.
Removing regional barriers to trade is also important.
In West Africa, for example, trade between Anglophone and Francophone
countries is restricted through economic policies, which limits the
marketability of salt produced in Senegal and Ghana, and fuels imports from
countries as far afield as Brazil and Namibia.
Government commitment to IDD, including creating a more favorable
environment for the salt industry, is essential if countries are to reach the
USI targets.
Salt Iodization procedures
Salt iodization involves the addition of a predetermined amount of a
source of iodine to salt during the production process, to ensure the correct
dosage of iodine, as stipulated by government standards. With the exception of
the United States, where potassium iodide is in use, salt iodization usually
involves addition of potassium iodate (KIO3) to salt. In the iodate form,
iodine is more stable and so is more likely to remain available even when
packaging is not optimal. Salt iodization can be done using either dry mixing
of an iodine source or a premix, drip feeding an iodine compound onto salt, or
spray mixing an iodine solution onto the salt.
The effectiveness of the different methods for different types of salt
is compared in the following table:
Comparison of key salt iodization methods
| Type of Salt |
Dry
mix |
Drip
|
Spray |
| Refined dry powder |
+++ |
++ |
+++ |
| Unrefined dry powder |
+++ |
++ |
+++ |
| Unrefined moist powder |
++ |
++ |
++ |
| Unrefined dry crystals |
+ |
++ |
++ |
| Unrefined moist crystals |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Source: Adapted from Mannar and Dunn (1995): Salt
Iodization for the elimination of iodine deficiency. MI/ICCIDD/WHO/UNICEF,
Micronutrient Initiative. Ottawa.
|
Click here for more detail on salt iodization procedures:
http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.1.pdf
The reference work, prepared by Venkatesh Mannar and John Dunn in 1995,
still serves as the standard technical guide to salt iodization. It provides
detailed information on planning, implementing and monitoring salt iodization
programs. Chapter 8 addresses techniques and procedures to follow for the
different iodization methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. It
also provides a brief introduction to methods that can be used at village level
for small scale salt fortification. The maintenance of equipment is also
covered.
Effect of Fortification on Product Quality and Appearance
The addition of iodine to salt does not change its colour or taste.
Iodized salt is indistinguishable from uniodized salt, and is fully acceptable
to consumers. Studies carried out to assess the impact of the presence of
Potassium Iodate or Potassium Iodite on the appearance and taste of a range of
prepared foods, including meat and dairy products, white bread, and soup
suggest no adverse effects, even at very high levels. For more information on
these studies, go to
http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.4.pdf
Equipment Procurement, Installation and Use
Iodization equipment must be designed to fit the capacity of the salt
works and must take into account the movement and handling of salt within the
salt facility. "One size fits all" units do not work.
Equipment, whether donated or purchased, must be integrated with
existing operations and should not result in excessive additional costs and
extra handling and movement of the salt.
On site training in the use and management of equipment is required.
Regular service and follow-up support as well as access to spare parts
are essential to ensure ongoing trouble-free iodisation.
More information about equipment for salt iodization can be found here:
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
Monitoring and Evaluation of Iodine Control Programs, notably Universal
Salt Iodization, is discussed in Chapter 5 and 6 of the following WHO
publication:
WHO
Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders
Costs
How much does salt iodization cost?
Mannar and Dunn (1995) provides a detailed breakdown of the capital and
operating costs of salt iodization. You can read more about costs in chapter 12
of this document:
http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.1.pdf
According to their estimates ( in 1996) the total cost of salt
iodization ranges from $3.95 to $14.80 per ton, with an average of $7.40, using
existing packaging, or $11.40 with new packing material. This amounts to 0.4 to
1.2 cents per kg or 1-6 cents per person per year, based on an estimated annual
consumption of 3 kg to 5kg. The retail price of crystalline salt for domestic
use ranges from $0.25 to $1.00 per kg. From these estimates, iodization
increases the retail price of salt by between 1 and 24%.
Small scale salt producers
While large scale salt producers now routinely iodize salt, resulting in
some 64% of households in Sub-Saharan Africa consuming iodized salt, most salt
produced by small scale salt producers is not currently iodized. To achieve the
goals of USI, innovative approaches are needed to ensure that a larger
proportion of salt is iodized. Small scale producers either need to set up
small-batch iodization plants or form collective operations (such as
cooperatives) for more centralized iodization and packing.
The benefits of forming a collective include producing higher volumes to
take advantage of economies of scale; increased ability to absorb price
fluctuations, and cope with market trends; it is possible to extend market
access as a group, and it is possible to receive technical support from donors,
development agencies, and financial assistance to gear for potential
sustainable growth and commercial viability.
Technical support for such ventures can be obtained from the
Micronutrient Initiative and other partners (add link to
partner page). Small scale salt manufacturers, with or without the
support of development partners like UNICEF, should contact their local
chambers of commerce for assistance in developing a business plan, access local
and international sources of funds, branding and monitoring and evaluation of
their venture.
Double Fortified Salt (DFS)
After more than a decade of rigorous research and development work, salt
fortified with both iodine and iron (in encapsulated form) can now be put to
work to improve the health and learning capacity of millions of children and
women world-wide.
Double fortified salt (DFS) consists of regular edible salt that has
been fortified with both iodine and iron. An encapsulated iron premix (also
called DFS premix) has been developed by the Micronutrient Initiative and
University of Toronto. It is suitable for blending with locally produced
iodized salt, thus resulting in double fortified salt. The DFS Premix is a
light grey granular powder with particle size close to that of refined iodized
salt. Efficacy studies in Ghana have demonstrated that DFS was efficacious in
reducing anemia in children by 23% over an eight-month period. Studies have
also shown that it is acceptable to consumers, and stable during storage and
transportation, even under harsh conditions.
Double fortified salt (DFS) can be produced by adding the encapsulated
iron to salt that has already been iodized. It can be done through a simple
batch process in any country where salt is already being iodized. Currently the
DFS premix is manufactured by one company, based in India. The company is ready
to export the DFS premix to companies in African countries where conditions are
right for such an innovation. DFS presents an opportunity for salt
manufacturers looking for a quality measure by which they can distinguish their
brand of salt from that of other salt manufacturing companies.
You can obtain more information about Double Fortified Salt and the DFS
Initiative here:
MIDouble
Fortified Salt Technical Breakthrough and here:
DFS
Initiative
The DFS product description can be found here:
DFS
product description
The DFS premix product description is here:
DFS
premix product description
| Country |
% of
Households consuming adequately iodized salt, 2000-2006 |
Total
Population (thousands, 2006) |
Unprotected population (thousands) |
| Burundi |
98 |
8173 |
163 |
| Nigeria |
97 |
144720 |
3907 |
| Uganda |
95 |
29899 |
1555 |
| Zimbabwe |
93 |
13228 |
873 |
| Kenya
|
91 |
36553 |
3436 |
| Lesotho |
91 |
1995 |
186 |
| Rwanda |
88 |
9464 |
1155 |
| Cote
d'Ivoire |
84 |
18914 |
2951 |
| Comores |
82 |
818 |
145 |
| Congo
|
82 |
3689 |
664 |
| Zambia |
77 |
11696 |
2643 |
| Madagascar |
75 |
19159 |
4713 |
| Mali
|
74 |
11968 |
3136 |
| Benin
|
72 |
8760 |
2479 |
| Congo, Democratic Rep |
72 |
60644 |
17284 |
| Eritrea |
68 |
4692 |
1501 |
| Botswana |
66 |
1858 |
635 |
| Namibia |
63 |
2047 |
759 |
| Central African Rep |
62 |
4265 |
1608 |
| South
Africa |
62 |
48282 |
18154 |
| Swaziland |
59 |
1134 |
462 |
| Chad
|
56 |
10468 |
4627 |
| Mozambique |
54 |
20971 |
9710 |
| Guinea |
51 |
9181 |
4517 |
| Cameroon |
49 |
18175 |
9251 |
| Malawi |
48 |
13571 |
7057 |
| Niger
|
46 |
13737 |
7418 |
| Sierra Leone |
45 |
5743 |
3182 |
| Tanzania |
43 |
39459 |
22334 |
| Senegal |
41 |
12072 |
7086 |
| Sao
Tome and Principe |
37 |
155 |
98 |
| Gabon
|
36 |
1311 |
839 |
| Angola |
35 |
16557 |
10779 |
| Burkina Faso |
34 |
14359 |
9520 |
| Ghana
|
32 |
23008 |
15553 |
| Togo
|
25 |
6410 |
4782 |
| Ethiopia |
20 |
81021 |
64898 |
| Gambia |
7 |
1663 |
1553 |
| Mauritania |
2 |
3044 |
2986 |
| Guinea-Bissau |
1 |
1646 |
1631 |
| Somalia |
1 |
8445 |
8344 |
| Sudan |
1 |
37707 |
37518 |
| Cape
Verde |
0 |
519 |
518 |
| Djibouti |
0 |
819 |
816 |
| Mauritius |
0 |
1252 |
1252 |
| Liberia |
No data |
3579 |
No data |
| Seychelles |
No data |
86 |
No data |
| Sub-Saharan Africa |
64 |
786916 |
304678 |
| Source: UNICEF. 2008. Sustainable Elimination of Iodine
Deficiency: Progress since the 1990 World Summit for Children |
|