FORTAF: Fortifying Africa’s Future - Fortifier L’avenir de L’Afrique

 

Planning and Implementing Salt Iodization at the Operational level

Overview

"We need to work with large, medium, and small producers across the region to ensure that all salt for human and animal consumption is effectively iodised. Salt exporters and importers should accept iodised salt as the only norm. Leakages of non iodised salt across markets and borders need to be plugged"

Venkatesh Mannar, President, Micronutrient Initiative

Like other fortification initiatives, salt iodization requires an effective and ongoing partnership between the public sector, the private sector and civil society. Government, the salt industry, and civil society organizations all have key roles to play to ensure an effective and sustainable program.

The Role of Governments

Governments play a key role in creating an enabling environment for salt producers to ensure the long- term sustainability of the salt industry and fortification in salt-producing countries. Government also needs to ensure that trade-related policies supports rather than undermines the consumption of iodized salt. Government roles thus include setting and enforcing regulations and standards, improving infrastructure (roads, transport), and ensuring that taxes and duties affecting the salt industry do not have a negative effect on the consumption of iodized salt.

Regulations and Standards:

34 countries in Africa have adopted legislation to regulate the production and distribution of iodized salt (Allen, et al, 2006. p 120) WHO Food fortification Guidelines

There is a need to for standard iodine levels across countries in Africa. This will promote salt trade between countries and simplify the monitoring of salt iodization.

Trade, taxes and duties

High taxes and duties on the salt industry are lucrative for governments in the short term, but their long term social and economic impacts are negative. It contributes to poor sales of salt, since prices are not competitive in the international market. This prevents growth and expansion within the industry, and inhibits job creation. This in turn reduces tax revenues for governments. Furthermore, from a development standpoint, poor performance with the prevention of IDD contributes to reduced GDP, increases the burden on the health care system.

Removing regional barriers to trade is also important.

In West Africa, for example, trade between Anglophone and Francophone countries is restricted through economic policies, which limits the marketability of salt produced in Senegal and Ghana, and fuels imports from countries as far afield as Brazil and Namibia.

Government commitment to IDD, including creating a more favorable environment for the salt industry, is essential if countries are to reach the USI targets.

Salt Iodization procedures

Salt iodization involves the addition of a predetermined amount of a source of iodine to salt during the production process, to ensure the correct dosage of iodine, as stipulated by government standards. With the exception of the United States, where potassium iodide is in use, salt iodization usually involves addition of potassium iodate (KIO3) to salt. In the iodate form, iodine is more stable and so is more likely to remain available even when packaging is not optimal. Salt iodization can be done using either dry mixing of an iodine source or a premix, drip feeding an iodine compound onto salt, or spray mixing an iodine solution onto the salt.

The effectiveness of the different methods for different types of salt is compared in the following table:

Comparison of key salt iodization methods

Type of Salt Dry mix Drip Spray
Refined dry powder +++ ++ +++
Unrefined dry powder +++ ++ +++
Unrefined moist powder ++ ++ ++
Unrefined dry crystals + ++ ++
Unrefined moist crystals + + +
Source: Adapted from Mannar and Dunn (1995): Salt Iodization for the elimination of iodine deficiency.
MI/ICCIDD/WHO/UNICEF, Micronutrient Initiative. Ottawa.

Click here for more detail on salt iodization procedures: http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.1.pdf

The reference work, prepared by Venkatesh Mannar and John Dunn in 1995, still serves as the standard technical guide to salt iodization. It provides detailed information on planning, implementing and monitoring salt iodization programs. Chapter 8 addresses techniques and procedures to follow for the different iodization methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. It also provides a brief introduction to methods that can be used at village level for small scale salt fortification. The maintenance of equipment is also covered.

Effect of Fortification on Product Quality and Appearance

The addition of iodine to salt does not change its colour or taste. Iodized salt is indistinguishable from uniodized salt, and is fully acceptable to consumers. Studies carried out to assess the impact of the presence of Potassium Iodate or Potassium Iodite on the appearance and taste of a range of prepared foods, including meat and dairy products, white bread, and soup suggest no adverse effects, even at very high levels. For more information on these studies, go to http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.4.pdf

Equipment Procurement, Installation and Use

Iodization equipment must be designed to fit the capacity of the salt works and must take into account the movement and handling of salt within the salt facility. "One size fits all" units do not work.

Equipment, whether donated or purchased, must be integrated with existing operations and should not result in excessive additional costs and extra handling and movement of the salt.

On site training in the use and management of equipment is required.

Regular service and follow-up support as well as access to spare parts are essential to ensure ongoing trouble-free iodisation.

More information about equipment for salt iodization can be found here:

Quality Assurance /Quality Control

Monitoring and Evaluation of Iodine Control Programs, notably Universal Salt Iodization, is discussed in Chapter 5 and 6 of the following WHO publication:

WHO Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders

Costs

How much does salt iodization cost?

Mannar and Dunn (1995) provides a detailed breakdown of the capital and operating costs of salt iodization. You can read more about costs in chapter 12 of this document: http://www.micronutrient.org/Salt_CD/4.0_useful/4.1_fulltext/pdfs/4.1.1.pdf

According to their estimates ( in 1996) the total cost of salt iodization ranges from $3.95 to $14.80 per ton, with an average of $7.40, using existing packaging, or $11.40 with new packing material. This amounts to 0.4 to 1.2 cents per kg or 1-6 cents per person per year, based on an estimated annual consumption of 3 kg to 5kg. The retail price of crystalline salt for domestic use ranges from $0.25 to $1.00 per kg. From these estimates, iodization increases the retail price of salt by between 1 and 24%.

Small scale salt producers

While large scale salt producers now routinely iodize salt, resulting in some 64% of households in Sub-Saharan Africa consuming iodized salt, most salt produced by small scale salt producers is not currently iodized. To achieve the goals of USI, innovative approaches are needed to ensure that a larger proportion of salt is iodized. Small scale producers either need to set up small-batch iodization plants or form collective operations (such as cooperatives) for more centralized iodization and packing.

The benefits of forming a collective include producing higher volumes to take advantage of economies of scale; increased ability to absorb price fluctuations, and cope with market trends; it is possible to extend market access as a group, and it is possible to receive technical support from donors, development agencies, and financial assistance to gear for potential sustainable growth and commercial viability.

Technical support for such ventures can be obtained from the Micronutrient Initiative and other partners (add link to partner page). Small scale salt manufacturers, with or without the support of development partners like UNICEF, should contact their local chambers of commerce for assistance in developing a business plan, access local and international sources of funds, branding and monitoring and evaluation of their venture.

Double Fortified Salt (DFS)

After more than a decade of rigorous research and development work, salt fortified with both iodine and iron (in encapsulated form) can now be put to work to improve the health and learning capacity of millions of children and women world-wide.

Double fortified salt (DFS) consists of regular edible salt that has been fortified with both iodine and iron. An encapsulated iron premix (also called DFS premix) has been developed by the Micronutrient Initiative and University of Toronto. It is suitable for blending with locally produced iodized salt, thus resulting in double fortified salt. The DFS Premix is a light grey granular powder with particle size close to that of refined iodized salt. Efficacy studies in Ghana have demonstrated that DFS was efficacious in reducing anemia in children by 23% over an eight-month period. Studies have also shown that it is acceptable to consumers, and stable during storage and transportation, even under harsh conditions.

Double fortified salt (DFS) can be produced by adding the encapsulated iron to salt that has already been iodized. It can be done through a simple batch process in any country where salt is already being iodized. Currently the DFS premix is manufactured by one company, based in India. The company is ready to export the DFS premix to companies in African countries where conditions are right for such an innovation. DFS presents an opportunity for salt manufacturers looking for a quality measure by which they can distinguish their brand of salt from that of other salt manufacturing companies.

You can obtain more information about Double Fortified Salt and the DFS Initiative here:

MIDouble Fortified Salt Technical Breakthrough and here: DFS Initiative

The DFS product description can be found here: DFS product description

The DFS premix product description is here: DFS premix product description


Country % of Households consuming adequately iodized salt, 2000-2006 Total Population (thousands, 2006) Unprotected population (thousands)
Burundi 98 8173 163
Nigeria 97 144720 3907
Uganda 95 29899 1555
Zimbabwe 93 13228 873
Kenya 91 36553 3436
Lesotho 91 1995 186
Rwanda 88 9464 1155
Cote d'Ivoire 84 18914 2951
Comores 82 818 145
Congo 82 3689 664
Zambia 77 11696 2643
Madagascar 75 19159 4713
Mali 74 11968 3136
Benin 72 8760 2479
Congo, Democratic Rep 72 60644 17284
Eritrea 68 4692 1501
Botswana 66 1858 635
Namibia 63 2047 759
Central African Rep 62 4265 1608
South Africa 62 48282 18154
Swaziland 59 1134 462
Chad 56 10468 4627
Mozambique 54 20971 9710
Guinea 51 9181 4517
Cameroon 49 18175 9251
Malawi 48 13571 7057
Niger 46 13737 7418
Sierra Leone 45 5743 3182
Tanzania 43 39459 22334
Senegal 41 12072 7086
Sao Tome and Principe 37 155 98
Gabon 36 1311 839
Angola 35 16557 10779
Burkina Faso 34 14359 9520
Ghana 32 23008 15553
Togo 25 6410 4782
Ethiopia 20 81021 64898
Gambia 7 1663 1553
Mauritania 2 3044 2986
Guinea-Bissau 1 1646 1631
Somalia 1 8445 8344
Sudan 1 37707 37518
Cape Verde 0 519 518
Djibouti 0 819 816
Mauritius 0 1252 1252
Liberia No data 3579 No data
Seychelles No data 86 No data
Sub-Saharan Africa 64 786916 304678
Source: UNICEF. 2008. Sustainable Elimination of Iodine Deficiency: Progress since the 1990 World Summit for Children

© The Micronutrient Initiative
Sitemap
Sponsored by: Nutrition Improvement Program, Micronutrient Initiative
Research by Whitehouse & Associates | Website managed by MBendi Information Services